Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Transplant Proc ; 55(3): 540-542, 2023 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2241031

ABSTRACT

Initial experience with lung transplant of COVID-19-positive donors was marked by disappointing results, including a reported case of mortality through donor to recipient transmission of infection. However, since that time a number of improvements in preventative and therapeutic measures against COVID-19 have been developed. We present the case of a 51-year-old woman with scleroderma-associated interstitial lung disease who was awaiting lung transplant. A potential donor with excellent lung physiology was located; however, initial testing on bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was positive for COVID-19. The donor had tested positive 2 weeks prior and had symptomatically recovered. Our patient had been fully vaccinated but not seroconverted. Given the history of a donor with recovering COVID infection and a fully immunized recipient, our multidisciplinary team elected to proceed with the transplant. The patient successfully underwent bilateral lung transplant with standard induction immunosuppression. Bebtelovimab was given post-transplant day 1 because the recipient remained seronegative to COVID-19. Serial bronchoalveolar lavages post transplant have been negative for COVID-19. The patient has done well after transplant. She was seen in the clinic 2 months post transplant and is ambulatory without supplemental oxygen requirements. To our knowledge, this represents the first reported successful case of lung transplant with a donor positive for COVID-19 on lower respiratory tract sampling.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Lung Transplantation , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Bronchoalveolar Lavage , Lung Transplantation/adverse effects , Tissue Donors
2.
Cureus ; 14(4): e24368, 2022 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1856261

ABSTRACT

Maple syrup urine disease (MSUD) is an inborn error of metabolism caused by a defect in the branched-chain alpha-ketoacid dehydrogenase complex (BCKDC). This leads to the accumulation of the branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs) leucine, isoleucine, and valine, which can cause neurotoxicity. Patients with MSUD are carefully managed from birth with dietary restrictions and can acutely decompensate in the setting of infections or injury. We present the case of a 29-year-old female with a history of MSUD and rheumatoid arthritis on methotrexate and adalimumab who presented to our emergency department with symptoms suggestive of a metabolic crisis including nausea, vomiting, and presyncope. She was diagnosed with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and admitted. An initial leucine level was mildly elevated at 253 µmol/L, consistent with her underlying metabolic condition. She was placed on an infusion of normal saline and 10% Dextrose (D10) in addition to a protein-restricted sick-day diet. Remdesivir therapy was initiated due to her immunocompromised status and high risk for decompensation but had to be discontinued due to nausea and vomiting that negatively impacted the patient's oral intake. Her leucine level peaked at 647 µmol/L; however, her neurologic examination remained benign without signs of cerebral edema. With prompt involvement of our metabolic genetics team and initiation of intravenous fluids and the sick-day diet protocol, we avoided a metabolic crisis. The patient was discharged on day 5 of hospitalization with no complications from COVID-19 infection. This case highlights the individualized approach to the treatment of COVID-19 infection in a patient with a metabolic disorder. COVID-19 infection in the setting of MSUD has only been reported in two prior publications, one being a severe metabolic crisis with neurologic involvement. Fortunately, our patient experienced a mild case of COVID-19 without significant respiratory symptoms, and we were able to prevent a metabolic crisis during admission.

3.
J Crit Care ; 69: 153989, 2022 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1814662

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Acute lung injury associated with COVID-19 contributes significantly to its morbidity and mortality. Though invasive mechanical ventilation is sometimes necessary, the use of high flow nasal oxygen may avoid the need for mechanical ventilation in some patients. For patients approaching the limits of high flow nasal oxygen support, addition of inhaled pulmonary vasodilators is becoming more common but little is known about its effects. This is the first descriptive study of a cohort of patients receiving inhaled epoprostenol with high flow nasal oxygen for COVID-19. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We collected clinical data from the first fifty patients to receive inhaled epoprostenol while on high flow nasal oxygen at our institution. We compared the characteristics of patients who did and did not respond to epoprostenol addition. RESULTS: The 18 patients that did not stabilize or improve following initiation of inhaled epoprostenol had similar rates of invasive mechanical ventilation as those who improved or stabilized (50% vs 56%). Rates of mortality were not significantly different between the two groups (17% and 31%). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with COVID-19 induced hypoxemic respiratory failure, the use of inhaled epoprostenol with high flow nasal oxygen is feasible, but physiologic signs of response were not related to clinical outcomes.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Noninvasive Ventilation , Respiratory Insufficiency , Cannula , Epoprostenol/therapeutic use , Humans , Noninvasive Ventilation/adverse effects , Oxygen , Oxygen Inhalation Therapy , Respiratory Insufficiency/therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL